Monday, October 7, 2013
the sensitivity to tamoxifen or to PI3K/mTOR inhibitors cannot easily be predic
Actin and PTEN colocalization was measured by immunofluorescence both in unirradiated cells or 30 h after irradiation with 6 Gy, to find out if the relationship between PTEN and actin was controlled by DNA damage. DNA destruction did not boost the degree of colocalization ALK Inhibitor to any considerable extent. Likewise, the clear presence of tumor produced mutations R11A, Y16C, F21A, and G129E in the GFP PTEN construct did not affect the colocalization between PTEN and actin. Pharmacological inhibition of actin depolymerization abrogates cell size check-point control in PTEN cells. We next considered the possibility a defect in actin remodeling may be responsible for the absence of size gate control in HCT116 PTEN cells. In cases like this, we would expect that pharmacological inhibition of actin remodeling in PTEN cells would be phenotypically equivalent to deletion of PTEN.
To check this, we measured the aftereffect of cytochalasin D, an effective inhibitor of actin polymerization, about the cell size gate in HCT116 PTEN and PTEN cells. Cells were then cultured for 3 days, treated with 6 Gy IR, and Inguinal canal pre-treated with 200 nM cytochalasin D. Cell sizes were then calculated. Pharmacological inhibition of actin polymerization abrogated cell size gate get a grip on in PTEN cells, recapitulating the phenotype of PTEN erasure. Notably, cytochalasin N had no effect on the size of PTEN cells, demonstrating the effect of the drug on cell size checkpoint control was specific to PTEN cells. But, exhaustion of gelsolin or EPLIN individually was inadequate to abrogate cell size checkpoint get a grip on.
Taken together, these data GW0742 indicate that the postirradiation cell size get a handle on defect in PTEN cells is caused by a generalized defect in the ability to generally regulate actin dynamics. The bio-chemical and genetic mechanisms that regulate cell size throughout cellular growth and cell cycle arrest stay generally hidden. To date, most published work on cell size checkpoints has concentrated on the existence of a sensing device in the G1 cycle of the cell cycle that is halted by the eukaryotic cell cycle until the cell has achieved sufficient size and mass to support cell division. In the studies presented here, we've focused our attention on a related but different issue?the mechanism responsible for ensuring that human cells arrested in the G1 or G2 phases of the cell cycle simultaneously stop increasing in size.
We focus particularly to the cell size check-point that is introduced during DNA damage induced charge. In the work described in this paper and in a previous book, we identified the PTEN tumefaction suppressor as an essential effector of this cell size checkpoint. Cells in which PTEN is deleted by human somatic cell gene targeting or in which PTEN is inactivated by naturally-occurring tumorderived strains cannot typically arrest their cell size during DNA damage induced cell cycle arrest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment